Billion-dollar Drug Company Nearly Squashes Astounding Research on Natural Cancer Killer
Colon and breast cancer conquered with miracle tree from the Amazon
found to be 10, 000 times stronger than chemotherapy.
Since our inception in 1996, Health Sciences Institute has scoured the
world to find cutting-edge treatments few people have access to or have
even heard about. And sometimes, what we uncover startles even the medical
mavericks on our board. Two months ago, we learned about an astounding
cancer-fighting tree from the Amazon that has literally sent shock waves
through the HSI network.
Today, the future of cancer treatment and the chances of survival look
more promising than ever. There's a healing tree that grows deep within
the Amazon rain forest in South America that could literally change how
you, your doctor, and possibly the rest of the world think about curing
cancer. With extracts from this powerful tree, it may now be possible to...
conquer cancer safely and effectively with an all-natural therapy that
doesn't cause extreme nausea, weight loss, and hair loss protect your immune
system and evade deadly infections feel strong and healthy throughout the
course of treatment boost your energy and improve your outlook on life.
Through a series of confidential communications involving a researcher
from one of America's largest pharmaceutical companies, this ancient tree's
anticancerous properties have recently come to light. Although not yet
tested in human trials, the tree has been studied in more than 20 laboratory
tests since the 1970s, where it's been shown to: Effectively target and
kill malignant cells in 12 different types of cancer, including colon,
breast, prostate, lung, and pancreatic cancer; be 10,000 times stronger
in killing colon cancer cells than Adriamycin, a commonly used chemotherapeutic
drug ; selectively hunt down and kill cancer cells without harming healthy
cells, unlike chemotherapy.
So why isn't every health publication extolling the benefits of this
treatment? Why hasn't it been made widely available throughout the natural-medicine
community? And, if it's only half as promising as it appears to be, why
isn't every oncologist at every major hospital insisting on using it on
all his patients? Especially when you consider that since the early 1990s,
extensive independent research--including research by one of today's leading
drug companies and by the National Cancer Institute--confirms that the
tree's chemical extracts attack and destroy cancer cells with lethal precision.
Graviola is 10,000 times stronger in killing colon cancer than Adriamycin,
a commonly used chemotherapeutic drug.
The answer to these difficult questions can only be explained by recounting
a disturbing story we recently uncovered. More than anything else we've
reported on this year, the story of this Amazon cancer treatment reinforces
the need for groups like HSI and illustrates how easily our options for
medical treatment are controlled by money and power. News of this amazing
tree was nearly lost forever.
A confidential source, whose account we've been able to independently
confirm, revealed that a billion-dollar drug company in the United States
tried for nearly seven years to synthesize two of the tree's most powerful
anticancerous chemicals. In the early 1990s, behind lock and key, this
well-known drug giant began searching for a cure for cancer--while preciously
guarding their opportunity to patent it and, therefore, profit from it.
Research focused on a legendary healing tree called Graviola. Parts
of
the tree--including the bark, leaves, roots, fruit, and fruit seeds--had
been used for centuries by medicine men and native Indians in South America
to treat heart disease, asthma, liver problems, and arthritis. Going on
little documented scientific evidence, the company poured money and resources
into testing Graviola's anticancerous properties--and they were shocked
by the results. Graviola was a cancer-killing dynamo. But that's where
the story of Graviola nearly ended.
The pharmaceutical company had a big problem. They'd spent years trying
to isolate and create man-made duplicates of two of the tree's most powerful
chemicals. But they'd hit a brick wall. They couldn't replicate the original.
And they couldn't sell the tree extract itself profitably-because federal
law mandates that natural substances can't be patented. That meant the
company couldn't protect its profits on the project it had poured millions
of dollars and nearly seven years of research into. As the dream of big
profits evaporated, testing on Graviola came to a screeching halt.
After seven frustrating years and without the promise of lucrative sales,
the company shelved the project and refused to publish its findings in
an independent journal. But one responsible researcher struggled with the
decision. while understanding the company's goal of profits, he couldn't
accept the decision to hide this unique cancer killer from the world. Following
his conscience and risking his career, he contacted a company dedicated
to harvesting medical plants from the Amazon Rainforest and blew the whistle.
They discovered that several other teams in the United States (in addition
to that of the drug company) had been testing Graviola in vitro (in test
tubes). The results supported the drug company's secret findings; Graviola
had been shown to kill cancer cells.
Graviola hunts down and destroys prostate, lung, breast, colon, and
pancreatic cancers... leaving healthy cells alone. Since November, we've
been looking closely into the research to date on Graviola. It appears
one of the first scientific references to it in the United States was by
the National Cancer Institute (NCI). In 1976, the NCI included Graviola
in a plant-screening program that showed its leaves and stems were effective
in attacking and destroying malignant cells. But the results were part
of an internal NCI report and were, for some reason, never released to
the public. Since 1976, there have been several promising cancer studies
on Graviola. However, the tree's extracts have yet to be tested on cancer
patients. No double-blind clinical trials exist, and clinical trials are
typically the benchmark mainstream doctors and journals use to judge a
treatment's value. Nevertheless, Graviola has been shown to kill cancer
cells in vitro in at least 20 laboratory tests that our research has uncovered.
The most recent study, conducted at Catholic University of South Korea
earlier this year revealed:
a. Two chemicals extracted from Graviola seeds showed
"selective cytotoxicity comparable with Adriamycin" for breast and colon
cancer cells. The chemicals targeted and killed malignant breast and colon
cells in a test tube--comparable to the commonly used chemotherapy drug
Adriamycin.
b. Another study, published in the Journal of Natural Products, showed
that Graviola is not only comparable to Adriamycin--but dramatically outperforms
it in laboratory tests. Results showed that one chemical found in Graviola
selectively kill red colon cancer cells at "10,000 times the potency of
Adriamycin."
c. Graviola selectively targets cancer cells leaving healthy cells untouched.
Chemotherapy indiscriminately seeks and destroys all actively reproducing
cells - even normal, healthy ones. Other promising and ongoing research
at Purdue University is supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute.
Purdue researchers recently found that leaves from the Graviola tree killed
cancer cells "among six human-cell lines" and were especially effective
against prostate and pancreatic cancer cells.
d. In a separate study, Purdue researchers showed that extracts from
the Graviola leaves are extremely effective in isolating and killing lung
cancer cells.
Perhaps the most significant result of the study cited above from
the Catholic University of South Korea, and of each of the others we've
found, is that Graviola was shown to selectively target the enemy--leaving
all healthy, normal cells untouched. By comparison, chemotherapy indiscriminately
seeks and destroys all actively reproducing cells--even normal hair and
stomach cells. This is what causes such often-devastating side effects
as hair loss and severe nausea. In this respect, Graviola looks to be a
promising alternative or supplement to mainstream treatments. Seven years
of silence broken.
We are continuing to work conducting ongoing research on Graviola. As
more scientific and anecdotal evidence comes to light, you'll be among
the first to hear about it. However, after seven years of silence and hidden
research, we felt it irresponsible not to bring this to you now.
1. Unpublished data, National Cancer Institute. Anon: Nat Cancer 1st
Central Files--( 1976)
from Napralert Files, University of Illinois, 1995
2. Bioorg Med Chem 8(1):285-90, 2000
3. J Nat Prod 59(2):100-108, 1996
4. Phytochemistry 49(2):565-7 1, 1998
5. J. Nat Prod 58(6):902-908, 1995
*These statements have NOT been evaluated
by the FDA. Products are not intended to diagnose treat, cure or prevent
any disease or condition.
This article is provided for informational purposes
only. No claims are made by Botanic Naturals that this
article is fact. You should not base medical decisions on this information.